There is so much more to consider than just
the cost of an IT system as presented in the last section. The total cost
of ownership includes such things as the ‘customer experience’, which is a
combination of customer support, service, and satisfaction. This is not
necessarily quantifiable in tangible dollar and cents. Adam Richardson
(2010) in an HBR article states: “To be really successful on a long-term basis, customer
experience needs to be seen as all these things, and more. It is the
sum-totality of how customers engage with your company and brand, not just in a
snapshot in time, but throughout the entire arc of being a customer (2010,
HBR).” The system
under analysis, IBM Watson, shows potential quantitative and qualitative value
that is highly competitive to alternative systems; SAP HANA, HADOOP, AND GOOGLE
ANALYTICS. (Please see the Competitive Analysis section of our website
for more information.) As in all business tools, there are tangible and
intangible benefits that are worth considering prior to investing in IT for
your company. First, we must relay our assumptions and cost statements (which
include the NPV of the return on investment) to optimize and quantify the value
and benefits we subscribe to IBM Watson for the stated purpose. Second, we will
discuss tangible and then intangible benefits and finally, we will consider the
value of these benefits in relation to the estimated costs.
We chose the professional subscription over
the open source software (free) version because UPMC is a large company in
relation to the amount of data to be handled and the subscription prince
includes license, security, basic storage, configuration, training, and
maintenance ($80/per month x 25(users)= $2,000) for a five-year period.
The Initial outlay is $2,000 (not including the $450 estimated
miscellaneous per month). Therefore, the Net Present Value of $2,000
(cost/year) can be invested earning interest of 7% over the next 5 years.
See the following link for details not included below: https://www.ibm.com/marketplace/cloud/watson-analytics/purchase/us/en-us#product-header-top
Figure
4.1 IBM Subscription On-Premise vs. Cloud
|
Software
TCO |
|
Costs
to Consider
|
On-Premise
|
Cloud
|
License
& Subscription
|
✓
|
✓
|
Installation
& Set-up
|
✓
|
▪
|
Customization
& Integration
|
✓
|
▪
|
Data
migration
|
✓
|
✓
|
Training
|
✓
|
▪ |
Maintenance
& Support
|
✓
|
▪ |
Hardware
|
✓
|
|
Other
(Consulting, business process engineering, connectivity, storage, backup,
network infrastructure)
|
✓
|
✓
|
Source: maximizer.com
Year
|
Figure 4.2 IBM Watson
Professional Subscription
|
0
|
$2,000
|
1
|
2,000
|
2
|
2,000
|
3
|
2,000
|
4
|
2,000
|
5
|
2,000
|
NPV
|
$6,200
|
PI
|
1.32
|
IRR
|
97%
|
The tangible benefits of subscribing
to Watson Analytics can be quantified in cost savings from using cloud based
operation; platform, infrastructure and software as a service based on needs
and leasing all the inclusive analytics package… all of which decrease costs
and subsequently increase revenue based on internal cost assignments per
question and answer analytics. In our case, IBM Watson Analytics is
offered as a (SaaS). Gallaugher (2015) mentions that "[F]irms using SaaS
can lower several costs associated with the care and feeding of their
information systems, including software licenses, server hardware, system
maintenance, and IT staff.”. This truth of Gallaugher’s observation can be seen
in our breakdown of professional subscription identified in Table 4.1.
Our project can claim a minimum savings of 25% with the costs of
inclusive items as mentioned below in Figure 4.3. These costs and savings are
factored in based on Forrester Research in accordance with “Information
Systems: A Manager’s Guide to Harnessing technology v4.0”. This piece of
research estimates that SaaS can bring cost savings of 25 to 60 percent if all
these costs are factored in (2016). Another cost savings is the minimal
training and implementation costs based on the analysis of a similar system SAP
HANA; their cost analysis report finds a 35% savings in training and
implementation. The increased revenue, which could also be considered a
costs savings, is based on the efficacy and efficiency of a Q&A cognitive
computing system that can refine data and answer the questions needed. In
the business of Pensiamo optimizing its supply chain to improve management of
drug inventory, IBM analytics actually establish the causal link between supply
and demand of over the counter drugs at all locations. This leads to
just-in-time availability of the right medications, in the right place at the
right time. The savings can be seen in the reduced percentage of expired or
unused medications. Finally, from McKinsey Quarterly and authors Mayew,
Saleh, and Williams (2016), we learn that companies can fail to get value from
analytics when they fail to ask the right questions, test options, properly
hire/train staff and design an elegant, interactive visual model. Therefore,
asking the right questions drives the value of this system. We find that Watson
analytics has designed an intuitive model so that the staff does not need
expensive training, nor do they need to be research, design, or code experts as
in larger legacy systems.
Figure 4.3 - Table of
Tangible Benefits
Cost Savings and Increased Revenue
|
Percentage
|
Cloud based Operations and SaaS
|
25%
|
Minimum Training and Implementation Costs
|
35%
|
Value and efficacy of cognitive computing
|
5%
|
Total Cost Savings
|
65%
|
Intangible benefits have the potential to add significant value based on what capabilities are realized. For example, the value and efficacy of cognitive computing cannot be quantified down to a specific dollar amount but it can be described it terms of its’ benefits. In a report from Accenture, Harris and Bataller (2015) say that “…decision makers should recognize that cognitive computing isn’t a matter of any single technology or application but is a field where the greater value will come from understanding the multitude of related technologies and then integrating those technologies into full solutions….” At Pensiamo, there will be additional benefits in the value chain; improved customer service, optimized management of over the counter (OTC) medications, more efficient labor, increased rate and flexibility of decision-making. Levinson (2005) states that retailers can improve their earnings per share up to 5 percent by reducing the number of out-of-stocks and improve customer experience by inventory availability.
The
advantages of using machine learning and predictive analysis capabilities in
the supply chain management optimizes the entire supply chain, rather than
point-by-point; augments management by providing the causes of inventory and
cost fluctuations; calculates the ideal stocking location and size of inventory
buffers; incorporates uncertainty and volatility into strategic inventory plans
and policies by using proven data-driven optimization algorithms; and finally,
performs “what-if” analysis to predict cost and service of alternative
scenarios. All of these advantages add value ultimately in the area of ‘the
customer experience”. The real value is when the patient can receive the
right medication at the right time at minimal cost to UPMC.
The value of
subscribing to IBM Watson analytics exceeds the total cost of ownership and
will pay dividends in future investments. At approximately $2000/year,
there is a very small capital investment of time and switching costs and no
upfront or initial costs. The subscription fee and periodic maintenance
or miscellaneous costs will be minimal. Therefore, the partnership of
UPMC and Pensiamo will begin to see a return on investment in the near future
as the combination of the cognitive computing of IBM Watson and supply chain
management expertise begins to refine, streamline and optimize their systems,
methods, and procedures.
References
Gallaugher,
J. (2015). Information systems: A manager’s guide to harnessing technology.
Washington, DC: Flat World Knowledge, Inc.
Harris, J. & Bataller, C.
(2015). Turning Cognative Computing into Business Value Today, Accenture.
Retrieved from https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-cognitive-computing-systems
Levinson, M. (2005, Dec 1). The Link Between Inventory
and Customer Satisfaction. Retrieved from http://www.cio.com/article/2448021/supply-chain-management/the-link-between-inventory-and-customer-satisfaction.html
McKinsey
Global Institute (2013, May). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will
transform life, business, and the global economy. Retrieved from
file:///C:/Users/martapelusi/Downloads/MGI_Disruptive_technologies_Executive_summary_May2013.pdf
Richardson, A. (2010,
Oct 28). Understanding Customer Experience. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2010/10/understanding-customer-experience
No comments:
Post a Comment